Head-to-head · Agent Builders & Automation
n8n vs Make
Verdict. Pick n8n if you want a visual workflow + AI-agent builder with MCP/AI nodes and a self-host option. Pick Make if you want a visual scenario builder with a free plan (1,000 credits/mo) and more control per dollar for complex flows.
Based on documented features and pricing (sources below). In the Agent Builders & Automation ranking n8n is #1 and Make is #3: initial editorial, pending tests.
| n8n | Make | |
|---|---|---|
| Editorial rank | #1 | #3 |
| Status | Initial editorial, pending tests | Initial editorial, pending tests |
| Loadout Score | TBD (not tested) | TBD (not tested) |
| Key features | Visual workflow plus AI-agent builder with MCP and AI nodes and a self-host option. A builder favorite. | Visual scenario builder that offers more control per dollar than Zapier for complex flows. |
| Pricing (as stated) | Starter €20/mo billed annually (2.5K executions); Pro €50/mo billed annually; Business €667/mo billed annually (self-hosted); Enterprise contact sales; free self-hosted Community Edition source · verified 2026-10-26 | Free (1,000 credits/mo); Core, Pro, Teams and Enterprise paid plans (dollar amounts unverified; credit-based) source · verified 2026-10-26 |
| Agent-Ready | 9/10 · Agent-native | 10/10 · Agent-native |
| ↳ API (3) | 3 Public REST API generated from OpenAPI · source | 3 Make REST API with API tokens · source |
| ↳ MCP server (2) | 2 Built-in n8n MCP server · source | 2 Make MCP Server · source |
| ↳ CLI / headless (2) | 2 n8n server CLI · source | 2 Make CLIs · source |
| ↳ SDK (1) | 0 No official client SDK found · source | 1 Make TypeScript SDK (linked from CLI page) · source |
| ↳ Machine-friendly docs (1) | 1 llms.txt plus OpenAPI · source | 1 llms.txt · source |
| ↳ Agent-friendly auth & limits (1) | 1 API key scopes · source | 1 Documented rate limiting; scoped API tokens · source |
| Official site | n8n.io ↗ | make.com ↗ |
Published test evidence
None yet for this pair. Neither tool has been tested and no public benchmark was found that covers both.
FAQ
- Is n8n or Make better for agent builders & automation?
- It depends on the job. Pick n8n if you want a visual workflow + AI-agent builder with MCP/AI nodes and a self-host option. Pick Make if you want a visual scenario builder with a free plan (1,000 credits/mo) and more control per dollar for complex flows. In our Agent Builders & Automation ranking n8n is #1 and Make is #3; that order is initial editorial, pending tests.
- How much do n8n and Make cost?
- n8n, as stated on its pricing page (checked 2026-10-26): Starter €20/mo billed annually (2.5K executions); Pro €50/mo billed annually; Business €667/mo billed annually (self-hosted); Enterprise contact sales; free self-hosted Community Edition. Make (checked 2026-10-26): Free (1,000 credits/mo); Core, Pro, Teams and Enterprise paid plans (dollar amounts unverified; credit-based). Prices change; follow the source links in the table.
- Which is better for AI agents and automation, n8n or Make?
- Make scores higher on our Agent-Ready audit (10/10 vs 9/10). The score counts documented API, MCP, CLI, SDK, docs and auth/limits support, and every point links to its source.
- Has Loadout tested n8n against Make?
- Not yet. Neither tool has a published Loadout test for this pair, and the verdict above is based on documented features and pricing.
Get the weekly Vibe Diff: new AI tools and price changes, free.
How this will be scored
Weights for Agent Builders & Automation: Q 25% · S 15% · C 15% · V 10% · A 15% · E 15% · T 5%. See the methodology.
n8n profile → Make profile → Best Agent Builders & Automation ranking → All rankings →